By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
HB 795 permits RBTs to serve as private instructional personnel in Florida public schools. This allows them to promote educational progress for students with disabilities by implementing behavioral interventions, supporting new skill acquisition, promoting socialization and work readiness, and more. The legislation applies to students with a range of disabilities, not only autism spectrum disorder. Importantly, the RBT must still operate under BACB supervision requirements, and the supervising BCBA retains clinical and ethical responsibility for the services delivered.
This is one of the key operational challenges HB 795 does not resolve. The BACB requires a minimum of 5% supervised hours monthly with at least one direct observation, regardless of setting. In schools, this means the supervising BCBA must have logistical access to observe the RBT during actual service delivery. Schools have fixed schedules, limited space, and their own administrative hierarchies. BCBAs should establish written agreements with school districts before services begin, specifying when and how supervision will occur and what access the BCBA will have to the student's classroom.
The primary benefits are: (1) expanded access to behavior-analytic support for students who currently receive limited or no individualized behavioral services during the school day; (2) more integrated and sustained implementation of behavioral interventions, since an RBT present in the school can deliver programming across the full school day rather than in isolated clinic sessions; and (3) improved support for teachers and paraprofessionals, as RBTs trained in behavior analysis can model correct implementation and provide in-the-moment consultation in ways that external providers cannot.
The three primary challenges are: (1) coordination ambiguity — the legislation is general and does not specify how BCBAs and school administrators will coordinate supervision, data sharing, and IEP integration; (2) scope of practice confusion — school staff unfamiliar with ABA may not understand what RBTs can and cannot do, leading to inappropriate assignments or role conflicts; and (3) supervision feasibility — the BACB's supervision requirements may be difficult to meet in school settings with rigid schedules and limited access for external supervisors.
The IEP is the governing document for educational services under IDEA. Any behavioral support provided by an RBT in a public school must align with the student's IEP goals. BCBAs who develop BIPs for school-based implementation must ensure those plans are consistent with the IEP and understandable by the IEP team, which may include general education teachers, special education teachers, related service providers, and administrators. BCBAs who are not IEP team members should proactively request participation in relevant meetings or establish clear channels for communicating with the team.
BCBAs should verify both RBT and BCBA competencies. For the RBT: skill with classroom-based behavioral support, ability to implement BIPs within instructional routines, professional communication with school staff, and understanding of confidentiality in the educational context. For the BCBA: familiarity with IDEA, FAPE, and LRE requirements, experience with IEP development and team participation, and ability to design BIPs that are implementable in classroom settings. BACB Ethics Code 4.01 requires supervision only within areas of competence — this includes school-specific practice competencies.
No. HB 795 is Florida state legislation that authorizes RBTs to serve as private instructional personnel. It does not modify BACB certification requirements, RBT supervision requirements, or Ethics Code obligations. The BACB's supervision requirements — minimum 5% supervised hours per month, direct observation, competency-based supervision activities — apply fully in school settings. BCBAs remain responsible for ensuring that these requirements are met regardless of the institutional context in which the RBT is placed.
A supervision agreement should specify: the BCBA's role and responsibilities, including the scope of their oversight of the RBT's work; the frequency and logistics of direct observation, including how the BCBA will access the classroom; data sharing protocols, including how student behavioral data will be communicated to the IEP team; the RBT's defined scope of practice within the school; communication procedures for urgent situations requiring immediate BCBA consultation; and the process for resolving disagreements between the BCBA's clinical recommendations and the school's administrative decisions.
BACB Ethics Code 2.03 requires BCBAs to work within institutional constraints to serve client interests and to advocate for changes when those constraints interfere with effective services. If a school's disciplinary policy — for example, response cost-based systems or exclusionary timeout — conflicts with a student's BIP, the BCBA should raise the concern with the IEP team and document their recommendation. If the school's position is maintained, the BCBA must document that the conflict was identified and the steps taken to advocate for the client's interests. In cases of serious ethical concern, Code 5.04 provides guidance on escalating within and outside the organization.
HB 795 specifies a parental authorization component for RBT services in public schools. Beyond the statutory requirement, BCBAs have an independent Ethics Code obligation under Code 2.02 to obtain informed consent from clients or their legal guardians for all behavior-analytic services. In the school context, this means ensuring that parents understand the nature of the behavioral services the RBT will provide, the supervising BCBA's role, and how data will be collected and used. Informed consent in school settings must also be consistent with FERPA and IDEA requirements for parental notification and participation.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
RBTs in the Classroom in Florida Schools: Opportunities and Challenges — Jack Scott · 1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $20
Take This Course →1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $20 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.