By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
Closing statements serve to synthesize the key clinical and scientific themes that have emerged across a day of presentations, consolidate the most actionable insights, and provide a forward-looking direction for professional practice. Practitioners engage most effectively with closing statements by coming prepared with their own synthesis from the day's content — noting recurring themes, unresolved questions, and specific practices they intend to change. Closing statements that are listened to passively produce less lasting behavior change than those engaged with actively, compared to one's own observations, and followed by a deliberate practice implementation plan.
The most important behavioral themes include: pain avoidance is operantly maintained and amenable to functional assessment and intervention; psychological flexibility — the capacity to engage with valued activities despite pain — predicts quality of life outcomes independent of pain intensity; partner and caregiver contingencies shape pain behavior and can be targeted through training; and ACT-based approaches have evidence for improving functioning in chronic pain populations. These themes position behavior analysis as a meaningful contributor to pelvic health interdisciplinary care, particularly in the behavioral and psychological dimensions of treatment.
Translating symposium learning into practice requires operationalizing specific actions: identifying which clinical behaviors will change, defining them in observable terms, setting a timeline, and building in a review point. For example, attending a pelvic health symposium might motivate a BCBA to develop a referral protocol for clients with apparent chronic pain presentations — a specific, observable clinical procedure that did not exist before. Or it might motivate adding an ACT-based psychological flexibility measure to intake assessment for relevant clients. The key is specificity: vague intentions to 'incorporate' learning rarely produce behavior change.
Effective interdisciplinary learning produces specific changes in how a practitioner understands, communicates, and collaborates — not just familiarity with other disciplines' terminology. It requires active engagement: asking questions, identifying how the other discipline's framework relates to one's own, noting where the approaches are complementary and where they diverge, and identifying specific collaboration behaviors that the learning motivates. A BCBA who attends a pelvic health symposium and leaves knowing the difference between exposure-based and acceptance-based approaches, understanding the pelvic floor physical therapist's role, and having a referral contact in pelvic health has engaged effectively. One who attended and can name some diagnoses has not.
BACB continuing education requirements specify the number of CEU hours in various categories (ethics, supervision, unrestricted) and the approved provider requirements for each. BCBAs should verify that symposia like Pelvicon offer BACB-approved CEUs before relying on them for recertification requirements. If a symposium offers CEUs from an approved provider, documentation typically includes a certificate of completion specifying the hours, provider approval number, and content category. BCBAs should maintain their CEU documentation in a format that is readily accessible for audit — organized by recertification cycle with copies of all certificates.
BCBAs interested in pelvic health specialization can pursue several pathways: developing clinical relationships with pelvic floor physical therapists and gynecologists who practice in their market, attending pelvic health symposia and continuing education, pursuing ACT training specifically relevant to chronic pain populations, reading the behavioral and pain medicine literature on chronic pain behavioral approaches, and seeking supervision from BCBAs or psychologists with experience in healthcare behavioral consultation. The American Pelvic Health Association and related professional organizations provide networking opportunities for clinicians across disciplines, including those entering the field from a behavioral background.
Closing statements that identify practice gaps and the continuing education needed to address them directly support Code 1.06 (Maintaining Competence), which requires behavior analysts to develop and maintain competence through ongoing professional development. Statements that identify scope-of-practice boundaries reinforce Code 1.02. Statements that highlight collaboration and referral pathways support Code 2.09. Engaging with closing statements as an ethical practitioner means not only learning the content but actively evaluating its implications for one's current practice and identifying specific steps to close any competency gaps identified.
Productive post-symposium reflection questions include: What do I understand now that I did not before attending? What specific clinical behaviors will I change as a result? What did I hear that I am not yet competent to act on, and what is my plan to address that gap? Who from the symposium do I want to maintain contact with for future collaboration? What referral relationships should I establish based on what I learned? And what aspects of the content apply most directly to my current client population? Answering these questions in writing, and sharing the answers with a supervisor or peer, increases the probability that learning will translate to practice change.
Client benefits from practitioner participation in multidisciplinary symposia are indirect but meaningful: practitioners who understand the clinical context of other disciplines make better referral decisions, communicate more effectively in team settings, design treatment plans that account for the full clinical picture, and advocate more effectively for clients in systems that include multiple providers. A BCBA who understands pelvic health sufficiently to recognize when a client's presentation warrants pelvic floor physical therapy assessment is providing better care for that client — not through expanded clinical service but through appropriate and timely referral.
Effective closing statements add synthesis value that exceeds recap: they identify the themes that connect the individual presentations into a coherent whole, highlight the clinical and scientific questions that the symposium raised but did not fully resolve, provide a forward-looking direction for clinical practice and research, and name the actions that practitioners can take immediately upon returning to their settings. Closing statements that are merely sequential summaries of the day's content provide information the audience already has; those that identify what was learned at the level of the whole symposium — the emergent insights that arose from putting diverse expertise in conversation — provide genuine synthesis value.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Pelvicon Vulvodynia Symposium 2024 - Closing Statements — Jessica Reale · 1 BACB General CEUs · $0
Take This Course →1 BACB General CEUs · $0 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.