By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
Several behaviors are particularly high-risk for misinterpretation. Failure to respond to verbal commands may be interpreted as defiance rather than processing delay or auditory sensitivity. Repetitive motor movements or stimming may be interpreted as pre-assault indicators or agitation. Flight behavior may be interpreted as fleeing from guilt rather than sensory overload or fear. Reaching into pockets for comfort objects may be interpreted as reaching for a weapon. Avoiding eye contact may be interpreted as deceptiveness. Physical resistance to touch may be interpreted as combativeness. Echolalia or unusual vocal patterns may be interpreted as mocking or intoxication. Each of these misinterpretations can trigger escalation responses that increase danger.
Use a graduated approach that builds skills in low-stress conditions before approximating real-world scenarios. Start with social stories or video models that introduce the concept. Progress to role-play with familiar adults in comfortable environments using minimal props. Gradually increase realism by adding uniforms, practicing in community settings, and incorporating mild sensory elements. Monitor the client's emotional state throughout and adjust pace and intensity accordingly. Never use flooding or surprise scenarios. For clients with trauma histories related to authority figures, consult with mental health professionals before beginning training. The goal is competence without traumatization.
A comprehensive crisis plan should include a brief identification card or document stating the individual's name, diagnosis, and emergency contacts. It should describe specific behavioral characteristics first responders should expect, including communication modality, sensory sensitivities, and likely stress responses. Include de-escalation strategies that work for the specific individual. Specify what approaches to avoid, such as physical restraint, loud commands, or sudden movements. Provide caregiver contact information for immediate consultation. The plan should be concise enough for first responders to review quickly and should be available in multiple formats including digital and physical copies.
Code 2.01 (Providing Effective Treatment) extends to foreseeable safety risks including first responder encounters. Code 3.12 (Advocating for Appropriate Services) obligates advocacy for first responder training and systemic accommodations. Code 2.15 (Minimizing Risk) requires that safety training methods not cause undue distress. Code 1.07 (Cultural Responsiveness) requires addressing the intersectionality of disability and race in safety planning. Behavior analysts who serve individuals at risk for negative first responder encounters have an ethical obligation to address this risk through direct skill instruction, crisis planning, and community advocacy.
Start by identifying the appropriate point of contact, often the training division or community outreach unit. Frame your offer as a collaborative partnership rather than a criticism of current practices. Emphasize the mutual benefit: better outcomes for the community members they serve and increased safety for officers. Offer practical, scenario-based training rather than lecture-only formats. Share data on the frequency of encounters between first responders and autistic individuals and the potential for tragedy when misunderstandings occur. Connect with local autism advocacy organizations that may have existing relationships with law enforcement. Be prepared to offer your services initially at no cost to establish the relationship and demonstrate value.
Autistic individuals of color face compounded risk because racial bias in policing intersects with disability-related misunderstanding. Research and documented incidents show that people of color are more likely to experience use of force during police encounters. When this risk is combined with autistic behaviors that may be misinterpreted as threatening, the danger is significantly amplified. Behavior analysts must address this intersectionality in safety planning by accounting for the specific risks faced by clients of color, developing safety strategies that address both disability and racial dynamics, and advocating for systemic changes that reduce racial bias in policing alongside improved disability training.
Caregivers play multiple essential roles. They should participate in developing and practicing crisis plans. They should carry identification information and crisis plans that can be provided to first responders. They should know how to quickly contact emergency services and communicate that an autistic individual is involved. They should practice de-escalation strategies so they can model calm behavior during encounters. In some situations, caregivers may need to serve as intermediaries between first responders and the autistic individual, translating communications in both directions. Behavior analysts should include caregiver training as a core component of first responder safety programming.
Identification systems can be helpful but should not be the sole safety measure. Medical alert bracelets, ID cards, phone apps, and alert systems can communicate essential information when the individual cannot. However, in high-stress encounters, first responders may not notice or check these identifiers. Some individuals may remove wearable identifiers. Digital systems require the first responder to look at a device. These tools are most effective as part of a comprehensive plan that also includes skill instruction for the individual, crisis planning, caregiver involvement, and first responder training. The most effective identification approach varies by individual and should be selected based on the client's preferences, tolerance for wearable items, and communication profile.
Elopement plans should include protocols for rapid notification of law enforcement with relevant information about the individual's appearance, behavioral characteristics, and likely destinations. Local first responders should be provided with the individual's crisis plan in advance so they can reference it during a search. GPS tracking devices should be considered for individuals at high elopement risk. Caregivers should practice calling 911 and providing concise, relevant information about the individual's autism and behavioral needs. Community partners such as neighbors and local businesses can be educated to recognize the individual and contact caregivers or authorities. The elopement plan should be reviewed and updated regularly and should account for seasonal and developmental changes.
Effective de-escalation strategies for encounters with autistic individuals include approaching slowly and calmly rather than rapidly, speaking in a low, even tone rather than shouting commands, maintaining physical distance to reduce sensory overload, using simple, concrete language and allowing extra processing time, avoiding sudden movements or physical contact unless absolutely necessary, reducing environmental stimulation by turning off sirens and flashing lights when safe to do so, looking for identification or medical alert indicators, contacting crisis intervention specialists when available, and recognizing that unusual behavior may indicate autism rather than intoxication, mental health crisis, or noncompliance. These strategies are consistent with general de-escalation principles but are specifically adapted for autistic presentations.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
First Responders and People Diagnosed with Autism, what each needs to know about the other. — Bobby Newman · 2 BACB Ethics CEUs · $0
Take This Course →2 BACB Ethics CEUs · $0 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.