By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
Three foundational ethical theories are most relevant. Consequentialism evaluates the ethics of actions based on their outcomes, asking which choice produces the greatest benefit and least harm. This aligns naturally with behavior analysis's emphasis on measurable outcomes. Deontology evaluates actions based on duties, rules, and rights regardless of consequences, providing the basis for absolute ethical principles such as informed consent and confidentiality. Virtue ethics focuses on the character of the moral agent, asking what a person of exemplary professional character would do. Each theory illuminates different aspects of ethical situations, and using multiple frameworks together produces more comprehensive ethical analysis than relying on any single theory.
Choice research reveals principles that influence all decision-making, including ethical decisions. Delay discounting research shows that immediate reinforcers are weighted more heavily than delayed ones, which may explain why practitioners sometimes choose immediately easier but less ethical options. Matching law research suggests that behavior is allocated proportionally to available reinforcement, meaning that ethical behavior is influenced by the relative reinforcement available for ethical versus unethical options. Understanding these principles allows behavior analysts to examine their own ethical decision-making for the influence of temporal and magnitude variables, and to arrange their professional environments to support ethical choices through immediate reinforcement, reduced response effort, and clear consequences.
A structured ethical decision-making model is a step-by-step process for analyzing and resolving ethical dilemmas. Typical models include steps for recognizing the ethical issue, gathering information, identifying relevant codes and principles, generating multiple options, evaluating options against ethical frameworks and likely consequences, selecting and implementing a course of action, and reflecting on the outcome. Structured models are important because they counteract the tendency to make ethical decisions based on intuition, emotion, or the most immediately salient consideration. They ensure that all relevant factors are considered, that multiple options are explored, and that decisions are documented with their rationale. Practiced use of structured models makes ethical reasoning more reliable under pressure.
Apparent conflicts between ethical codes are common and require careful analysis. First, determine whether the conflict is genuine or whether it reflects an incomplete understanding of one or both codes. Many apparent conflicts dissolve upon closer reading. If a genuine tension exists, consider which code is more directly relevant to the specific situation, which interpretation best serves the client's interests as required by Code 2.01, what the likely consequences of prioritizing each code would be, and what additional information might help resolve the tension. Consultation with colleagues and ethics committees is particularly valuable when codes appear to conflict. Document your analysis and rationale regardless of which direction you choose, demonstrating that your decision was thoughtfully considered rather than arbitrary.
Ethical sensitivity is the ability to recognize when a situation has ethical dimensions. It is a prerequisite for ethical reasoning because you cannot analyze an ethical issue you do not perceive. Many ethical failures begin not with poor reasoning but with a failure to recognize that an ethical issue is present. Ethical sensitivity can be developed through exposure to a wide range of ethical scenarios through case studies and discussions, regular practice in identifying ethical dimensions of everyday clinical situations, supervision that routinely highlights ethical aspects of case work, reading about ethical issues in behavior analysis and related fields, and reflection on past situations where ethical dimensions were initially missed. The Dear Don panel format supports ethical sensitivity development by presenting complex scenarios and demonstrating how expert practitioners identify their ethical dimensions.
Consultation is one of the most valuable tools for ethical decision-making, recognized in Code 2.03. Consulting with colleagues provides access to different analytical perspectives, different areas of expertise, different cultural viewpoints, and different ethical frameworks. A colleague may identify stakeholders or consequences that you overlooked, challenge assumptions in your analysis, or suggest creative alternatives you had not considered. Consultation is especially important for complex dilemmas where multiple ethical principles are in tension, for situations where your personal interests may be influencing your judgment, and for decisions with significant consequences. Building a network of trusted colleagues for ethics consultation is an investment in the quality of your ethical practice.
Using principles from choice research and organizational behavior management, behavior analysts can arrange their professional environments to make ethical behavior easier and more reinforcing. Strategies include reducing the response effort for ethical behavior such as making documentation templates accessible and efficient, arranging immediate positive consequences for ethical behavior such as supervisor recognition and peer acknowledgment, making the consequences of unethical behavior more salient and immediate rather than delayed and abstract, creating organizational cultures where ethical discussions are normalized and ethical concerns are welcomed, establishing clear policies that remove ambiguity about expected ethical conduct, and providing time and resources for ethical consultation rather than expecting practitioners to fit it into already packed schedules.
Moral distress occurs when a practitioner knows the ethically correct course of action but feels unable to take it due to organizational pressures, financial constraints, insurance limitations, or power dynamics. In ABA settings, moral distress might arise when a behavior analyst knows a client needs more intensive services than insurance will authorize, when organizational policies conflict with ethical best practice, or when speaking up about an ethical concern could jeopardize job security. Addressing moral distress requires recognizing it as a legitimate professional experience, seeking consultation and support from colleagues, documenting ethical concerns through appropriate channels, advocating for systemic changes under Code 2.16, and caring for one's own wellbeing to prevent burnout. Persistent moral distress may indicate that the practice environment is fundamentally incompatible with ethical practice.
When multiple experts analyze the same ethical dilemma, they demonstrate several important lessons. Different professionals may identify different ethical dimensions of the same situation, highlighting the importance of comprehensive analysis. They may weight ethical principles differently, reflecting legitimate philosophical differences that practitioners should understand. They may reach different conclusions through sound reasoning, demonstrating that ethical dilemmas are genuinely complex rather than having obvious right answers. And they model respectful professional disagreement, showing how to discuss ethical differences constructively. This exposure to multiple perspectives inoculates practitioners against the false belief that ethical decisions are simple and that reasonable people will always agree.
Documentation of ethical decision-making should include a description of the ethical issue or dilemma, the information gathered and stakeholders considered, the relevant ethical codes and standards identified, the options generated and evaluated, the chosen course of action and the reasoning behind it, the implementation plan and any consultations obtained, and a follow-up evaluation of the outcome. This documentation serves multiple purposes: it provides accountability, supports reflection and learning, creates a record that can be referenced if the decision is later questioned, and models ethical reasoning for supervisees and colleagues. Documentation should be maintained in a manner consistent with organizational policies and confidentiality requirements. Under Code 1.04, thorough documentation of ethical reasoning demonstrates the integrity the code requires.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Dear Don Ethics Panel Nov%202023 — CASP CEU Center · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $
Take This Course →1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $ · CASP CEU Center
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.