By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
Section 2.09 of the BACB Ethics Code (2022) states that behavior analysts must make reasonable efforts to coordinate with other providers when doing so serves the client's best interest. This obligation is not discretionary. If a client is receiving services from multiple disciplines, the BCBA has a duty to initiate contact, establish information-sharing protocols, and integrate findings across providers into the behavior-analytic treatment plan. Failing to coordinate when other providers are known creates both ethical risk and clinical harm through contradictory or redundant service delivery.
Begin by identifying the behaviors targeted across all disciplines and checking for definitional overlap or conflict. Convene a brief working meeting — even 30 minutes — with all relevant providers to align on operational definitions for any shared targets. Distribute a written document with agreed-upon definitions, examples, and non-examples. Build in a calibration check at the next team meeting: have each provider independently score a video clip or case vignette and compare results. Consistent data across disciplines is only possible when everyone is measuring the same thing, and that requires explicit agreement followed by verification.
Time constraints and scheduling differences are the most frequently cited logistical barriers — providers may work at different times in different settings. Professional territoriality is a significant cultural barrier, with some disciplines being protective of assessment and treatment domains. Differing theoretical frameworks can create communication friction, particularly between behavioral and developmental or psychodynamic perspectives. Inadequate documentation systems that do not allow easy data sharing across providers are a structural barrier. Finally, lack of formal training in interprofessional collaboration means many clinicians do not have the communication and negotiation skills these partnerships require.
Start by presenting your data clearly and in a format accessible to clinicians without a behavior-analytic background. Avoid framing disagreements as paradigm conflicts; focus on the specific client evidence available. Ask genuine questions about the basis for the other clinician's recommendation — their data or clinical observations may reveal something you have not captured. If direct discussion does not resolve the disagreement, escalate through the appropriate administrative structure (team coordinator, supervisor, or referring physician). Document your concerns, your data, and the resolution in the client record. The client's welfare is the governing standard under BACB Ethics Code Section 2.01.
Compassion in team settings refers to a genuine orientation toward the suffering and challenges of clients that is shared across providers, rather than defended within disciplinary silos. Clinically, teams that are explicitly aligned around a shared commitment to the client's quality of life tend to make better decisions during conflicts and prioritize client outcomes over professional prestige. Compassion also applies to team relationships: understanding the constraints other providers work under, acknowledging their expertise, and assuming good faith in disagreements produces more durable working relationships. This is not merely a soft interpersonal skill; it has measurable effects on information sharing, treatment coordination, and client outcomes.
IEP teams are legally constituted bodies with defined roles and decision-making procedures under IDEA. BCBAs working in school settings should understand the IEP process well enough to contribute meaningfully to goal-setting, evaluation, and placement decisions. Behavioral assessment data should be presented in IEP-compatible formats, and behavioral goals should be written in measurable terms that align with the IEP's overall structure. BCBAs should also understand the roles of special education teachers, school psychologists, and related service providers in the IEP team so that contributions are appropriately scoped. Attempting to drive all decisions or dismissing non-behavioral perspectives undermines the collaborative structure the IEP process depends on.
Regular structured team meetings with a clear agenda, designated note-taker, and documented action items are the foundation. Shared data platforms that allow multiple providers to view progress data between meetings reduce information asymmetry. Brief, standardized update templates — a short email or electronic message covering recent progress, upcoming changes, and any concerns — allow busy clinicians to stay informed without lengthy meetings. Family-facing communication should be coordinated so that caregivers receive consistent messages. Designating a care coordinator or team lead for complex cases helps ensure that information flows appropriately and that no provider is operating without current clinical information.
Yes. When team processes are poorly structured, meetings become unfocused and time is wasted without clear decisions. Diffusion of responsibility is a documented risk in large teams: when everyone is responsible, no one is accountable, and critical tasks fall through the gaps. Over-reliance on team consensus can delay timely clinical decisions when action is needed quickly. Some clients are also poorly served by having many providers, each seeing only a fragment of the clinical picture. BCBAs should periodically evaluate whether the collaborative structure is producing better outcomes or simply adding administrative burden. The question is always whether the coordination effort is improving the client's trajectory.
Documentation should capture who was contacted, when, the method of contact, the clinical purpose of the communication, what was discussed or agreed upon, and any follow-up responsibilities assigned. For team meetings, a brief meeting note with attendees, agenda items, decisions made, and action items assigned provides an adequate record. For informal consultations with other providers, a brief note in the session record or treatment file is sufficient. When treatment changes result from collaborative discussions, the rationale should reference the team agreement explicitly. This documentation supports transparency, ensures accountability, and provides the clinical record needed if outcomes are later questioned.
RBTs interact daily with other team members — classroom teachers, paraprofessionals, speech therapists, and caregivers — but rarely receive explicit training in how to navigate these relationships. Supervision should include direct instruction on professional communication, how to respond when an RBT observes a concern that involves another provider's domain, and the chain of communication for escalating clinical issues. Role-playing difficult conversations — an RBT being asked by a teacher to skip a procedure, or observing a communication conflict between providers — builds practical skill. Supervisors should also ensure RBTs understand the treatment plan well enough to answer basic questions from other team members consistently and accurately.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Coordinated Compassion: A Comprehensive Approach in ABA — Melanie Shank · 1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $10
Take This Course →1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $10 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.