A Seat At The Table Meaningful Advocacy is the kind of topic that looks straightforward until it collides with the speed, ambiguity, and competing demands of case conceptualization, intervention design, staff training, and literature-informed problem solving. In A Seat At The Table Meaningful Advocacy, for this course, the practical stakes show up in stronger conceptual consistency and better translational decision making, not in abstract discussion alone.
Provider: CASP CEU Center
Take This Course →Including ethics, supervision, and topics like this one. New live CEU every Wednesday.
Join Free →A Seat at the Table Meaningful Advocacy for Autism Service Providers Short Title: A Seat at the Table: Meaningful Advocacy Original Air Date: December 15, 2022 CEU offered: 1.5 Learning CEU Webinar Duration: 90 minutes CE Instructors: Ashley Williams, PhD, LBA, BCBA-D Rebecca Giamatti, MS, BCBA, LBA-CT Rebecca Womack, MS, BCBA, LBA Judith Ursitti Abstract: 2022 has been a year of simultaneous challenge and progress as CASP members advocated on the state and federal levels to ensure provider best practice is recognized and appropriately reimbursed. Learn about specific progress and strategy moving forward, including: TRICARE Autism Care Demonstration Coverage of Applied Behavior Analysis Under EPSDT Licensure Workforce Mental Health Parity Generally Accepted Standards of Care Now more than ever, autism service providers must have a seat at the table when critical policy issues are being discussed. Learning Objectives: Participants will understand why it's important to have payor policies aligned with generally accepted standards of care. Participants will understand how Medically Unlikely Edits (MUEs) are being misused with ABA CPT codes and the important step providers can take to further advocacy efforts. Participants will understand examples of strategies to work successfully with Medicaid agencies on issues relating to rates and codes.
| Certification Body | Credits | Type |
|---|---|---|
| BACB | 1 | General |
Side-by-side comparison with a clinical decision framework
Research-backed educational guide for behavior analysts
Research-backed answers to common clinical questions
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.