Starts in:

By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Clinical decision guide

Parallel Treatment vs. Integrated Multidisciplinary Treatment for Mental Health-Related Behaviors

In This Guide
  1. Side-by-Side Comparison
  2. Clinical Decision Framework
  3. Key Takeaways

One of the most consequential decisions a behavior analyst makes is not just what intervention to use, but how to approach the clinical question in the first place. For the multidisciplinary team approach to treating mental health related behaviors, the difference between an evidence-based, individualized approach and a traditional, protocol-driven one can significantly impact outcomes.

This guide lays out the key factors side by side to support your clinical decision-making.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Factor Evidence-Based Approach Traditional Approach
Communication Between Providers Parallel: Occasional reports shared upon request; minimal real-time communication; providers may be unaware of changes in the other's treatment Integrated: Regular team meetings, shared documentation, and established protocols for communicating changes in treatment across providers
Assessment Coordination Parallel: Each provider conducts independent assessments that may not reference or build upon findings from other disciplines Integrated: Assessment findings are shared across disciplines, with each provider's evaluation informing and enhancing the others
Treatment Plan Coherence Parallel: Risk of contradictory approaches where behavioral and psychiatric interventions may work at cross-purposes Integrated: Unified treatment plan where behavioral and psychiatric interventions are coordinated to complement each other
Medication Monitoring Parallel: Behavior analyst may not know about medication changes; psychiatrist receives only subjective reports about behavioral effects Integrated: Behavioral data systematically shared with prescriber; medication effects and behavioral intervention effects tracked concurrently
Crisis Response Parallel: Each provider has a separate crisis plan; response depends on which provider is contacted first during a crisis Integrated: Unified crisis plan incorporating psychiatric and behavioral perspectives with clear roles for each provider
Client and Family Experience Parallel: Family may receive contradictory guidance from different providers; burden of coordination falls on the family Integrated: Family receives consistent messaging and coordinated guidance; providers manage inter-provider communication
Data-Based Decision Making Parallel: Each provider analyzes only their own data; treatment decisions based on incomplete picture of the client's response Integrated: All available data considered when making treatment decisions; behavioral trends contextualized within the full clinical picture
FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →

Clinical Decision Framework

Use this framework when approaching the multidisciplinary team approach to treating mental health related behaviors in your practice:

Step 1: Is intervention warranted?

Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?

YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor

Step 2: Have you conducted an individualized assessment?

A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.

YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first

Step 3: Is the individual/caregiver involved in decision-making?

Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.

YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making

Step 4: Verify your approach

Key Takeaways

Go Deeper With This CEU

This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.

The multidisciplinary team approach to treating mental health related behaviors — Taka Soda · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20

Take This Course →
📚 Browse All 60+ Free CEUs — ethics, supervision & clinical topics in The ABA Clubhouse

Related

CEU Course: The multidisciplinary team approach to treating mental health related behaviors

1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $20 · BehaviorLive

Guide: The multidisciplinary team approach to treating mental health related behaviors — What Every BCBA Needs to Know

Research-backed educational guide

FAQ: 10 Questions About The multidisciplinary team approach to treating mental health related behaviors

Research-backed answers for behavior analysts

Clinical Disclaimer

All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.

60+ Free CEUs — ethics, supervision & clinical topics