By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Clinical decision guide
One of the most consequential decisions a behavior analyst makes is not just what intervention to use, but how to approach the clinical question in the first place. For paws for thought: becoming a better behavior analyst by training dogs, the difference between an evidence-based, individualized approach and a traditional, protocol-driven one can significantly impact outcomes.
This guide lays out the key factors side by side to support your clinical decision-making.
| Factor | Evidence-Based Approach | Traditional Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Feedback on timing | Immediate, transparent — wrong behavior increases when timing is off; difficult to attribute to other causes | Partially masked by verbal mediation; timing errors may not produce clearly visible misattributed outcomes |
| Reinforcer assessment | Direct observation required; verbal report and assumption unavailable | Verbal report and standardized tools available; direct observation sometimes bypassed |
| Shaping skills | Repetitive practice with clear behavioral feedback on criterion accuracy | Shaping practiced in human clinical contexts with more variable feedback |
| Behavioral observation | Postural and behavioral indicators of internal state must be read directly; language is unavailable | Verbal behavior available as additional source of information about client state |
| Understanding of behavioral principles | Cross-species application deepens understanding of principles as general laws | Application primarily in human clinical contexts; principles experienced as clinical techniques |
| Clinical competency development | Procedural skills developed in animal context transfer directly to human clinical work | Procedural skills developed in human clinical context from the beginning |
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Use this framework when approaching paws for thought: becoming a better behavior analyst by training dogs in your practice:
Does the data support a need for intervention? Is there a meaningful impact on the individual's quality of life, safety, or access to reinforcement?
YES → Proceed to assessment NO → Document reasoning, monitor
A functional assessment should guide intervention selection. Avoid defaulting to standard protocols without individual analysis. Consider environmental variables, setting events, and private events.
YES → Select evidence-based approach matched to function NO → Complete assessment first
Goals should be co-developed. Assent and informed consent are ethical requirements. The individual's preferences and values matter in selecting both goals and methods.
YES → Proceed with collaborative plan NO → Engage in shared decision-making
This course covers the clinical and ethical dimensions in detail with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Paws for Thought: Becoming a better behavior analyst by training dogs — Keira Moore · 2 BACB Ethics CEUs · $30
Take This Course →2 BACB Ethics CEUs · $30 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide
Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.