Perspectives of Indian Speech-Language Pathologists on Implementing Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems for Individuals with Nonverbal Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Indian SLPs value AAC but need gear, funds, and training to make it work.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Bhavya and colleagues asked Indian speech-language pathologists how they view AAC for nonverbal autistic clients.
They used an online survey. No numbers were reported.
What they found
SLPs like AAC and see it as valuable.
They say lack of devices, funds, and hands-on training blocks real use.
How this fits with other research
Alhuzimi (2026) asked Saudi teachers the same question and got the same answer: no training, no tech, no buy-in.
Giofrè et al. (2014) heard the same from adult-care teams a decade ago, showing the barrier story is old and global.
Sievers et al. (2020) surveyed SLPs worldwide and listed twenty extra clinical cues that predict AAC success—details Indian SLPs could use right now.
Why it matters
If you write AAC plans for Indian clients, expect device shortages and SLPs who want help. Pair Bhavya’s barrier list with B et al.’s predictor list to target training and justify funding requests. Share the Saudi teacher data with schools to show the problem crosses disciplines and needs joint solutions.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Send your local SLP the twenty predictor factors from B et al. (2020) and ask which ones your next client needs.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The implementation of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) systems for individuals with nonverbal Autism Spectrum Disorder (nvASD) remains highly debated, especially in a multilingual and multicultural country like India. Existing AAC guidelines are largely Western-based and may not be fully applicable in the Indian context. This study explored the perspectives of Indian Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) on AAC implementation in individuals with nvASD. A cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 involved developing and validating a questionnaire assessing SLP's practices and attitudes towards AAC. In phase 2, the validated questionnaire was administered online to 93 Indian SLPs (29.23 years of mean age, 71% female) represented diverse clinical, educational, and academic settings. The survey explored key parameters, including AAC candidacy, cultural and linguistic adaptation, AAC selection and customization, interdisciplinary collaboration and caregiver involvement, outcome based evaluation practices, speech-AAC integration, and barriers to AAC implementation. Most SLPs emphasized working on communication prerequisites before introducing AAC. Vocabulary selection was prioritized over partner training. AAC was primarily used for both intervention and communication, employing goal-oriented approaches alongside other speech and language strategies. Challenges included lack of resources, inadequate training, and limited interdisciplinary collaboration. Parental involvement and caregiver feedback were identified as critical to success. SLPs in India broadly recognize AAC as a valuable tool for individuals with nvASD but report facing multiple systemic and practical challenges to its implementation. The findings underscore the need for culturally and contextually relevant AAC guidelines, targeted clinician training, and supportive policy measures to improve access and long-term communication outcomes in Indian settings.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025 · doi:10.4103/jisha.jisha_40_24