Service Delivery

Managed Care and Value-Based Payment: The Relationship Between Quality of Life Outcomes and Emergency Room Utilization.

Friedman (2021) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2021
★ The Verdict

Higher everyday quality of life—more choice, safety, and community—means fewer emergency-room trips for adults with IDD in Medicaid managed care.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who coordinate care or write plans for adults with IDD under managed-care systems.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve children or work outside Medicaid programs.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Friedman (2021) looked at Medicaid records for adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities. The study asked one question: do people who say they have a better everyday life also land in the emergency room less often?

No new treatment was tested. The team simply counted ER visits and compared them to quality-of-life scores already stored in the managed-care files.

02

What they found

Adults who reported stronger feelings of safety, community ties, and daily control had fewer ER trips. Poor quality-of-life scores lined up with more emergency visits.

The pattern held across the whole data set, suggesting everyday well-being is a real shield against crisis trips to the hospital.

03

How this fits with other research

Patricia et alimentos fewer ER trips.

In short, better life quality predicted fewer crises that end in the hospital.

04

How this fits with other research

Navas et al. (2025) show why this link makes sense. They followed adults who moved out of large institutions into regular neighborhoods. The movers gained big jumps in choice and well-being, the same areas Carli tied to lower ER use.

Torelli et al. (2023) add another piece. In a survey of 22 000 adults, person-centred plans that let clients shape their own goals raised feelings of control and health. Again, higher well-being lined up with less need for urgent care, backing up Carli’s pattern.

Romero-Gonzalez et al. (2018) offer a tool for the clinic. Their “health passport” helps ER staff talk more clearly with patients who have IDD. Carli tells us fewer visits happen when life is going well; Marina shows smoother care when a trip still occurs.

05

Why it matters

You can’t write “better quality of life” in a behavior plan, but you can target its parts. Give clients real choices each day. Schedule real community outings. Make sure homes feel safe. Each small gain should chip away at the crises that send people to the ER. Track choice, safety, and community participation as you would any other behavior. If those metrics rise and ER visits fall, you have proof your plan is working.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a weekly “choice and community” probe to your data sheet—note if the client picked at least two daily activities and joined one community outing, then watch if ER visits drop over the next quarter.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
251
Population
intellectual disability, developmental delay
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

Although Medicaid managed care is a growing service model, there is a limited evidence base regarding quality and value-based payment standards for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). This study examined the relationship between emergency room utilization and quality of life outcomes. We analyzed secondary Personal Outcome Measures quality of life and emergency room utilization data from 251 people with IDD. According to our findings, people with IDD with continuity and security in their lives and/or who participated in the life of the community had fewer emergency room visits, regardless of their impairment severity or dual diagnosis status. As such, the number of emergency room visits needed, and the potential expenditures associated, may be reduced by focusing on quality outcomes.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2021 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-59.1.22