School & Classroom

Using Precision Teaching to Improve Typically Developing Student’s Mathematical Skills Via Teleconferencing

Kapoor et al. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Education 2025
★ The Verdict

Fifty-five Zoom-based Precision Teaching lessons pulled low-scoring first-graders from the bottom fifth to the top third in math fluency.

✓ Read this if BCBAs helping elementary students with math in any setting.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only working on language or daily-living skills.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Kapoor's team ran 55 short Zoom lessons for first- and second-graders who scored below the 15th percentile in math. They used Precision Teaching: one-minute timed worksheets, instant charting, and daily goals.

Kids worked from home while a tutor watched on camera. The study compared this group to similar children who got no extra math help.

02

What they found

After the tele-sessions, the Zoom group jumped from below the 15th percentile to above the 65th percentile in math fluency. The no-treatment group stayed put.

Gains held weeks later without extra practice.

03

How this fits with other research

Stocker et al. (2021) also boosted math fluency, but had sixth-graders run their own one-minute sprints in class. Both studies show fast practice works; Kapoor proves it can work through a screen.

Powell et al. (2023) used the same Precision Teaching method with elementary students, yet had high-schoolers give the lessons in person. Their students improved too, but Powell did not report how much. Kapoor adds hard numbers and shows Zoom can replace in-person tutors.

Shawler et al. (2021) and Swensson et al. (2024) already showed telehealth can train teachers and parents. Kapoor extends that idea to direct academic instruction with typical kids.

04

Why it matters

You can run a full Precision Teaching math clinic from your laptop. No extra staff, no travel, just a timer, worksheets, and a Zoom link. Try a one-minute sprint plus charting at the start of each online session this week.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open your next online session with a one-minute math sprint, count correct digits, and plot the score on a Standard Celeration Chart.

02At a glance

Intervention
precision teaching
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
13
Population
neurotypical
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

This study evaluated the effects of Precision Teaching in improving typically developing students’ mathematical skills when delivered via teleconferencing in India. Four students received Precision Teaching, while nine acted as control participants. Precision teaching involved instruction in three mathematical skills; two prerequisite skills and the primary skill of mixed addition and subtraction facts. Instruction included untimed practice, timed practice, goal-setting, graphing, and a token economy. Participants who received Precision Teaching received ten practice sessions for the prerequisite skills and 55 sessions for the primary skill. The results demonstrated improvements in the prerequisite skills of varied magnitude and considerable improvements in the primary skill, which were maintained above baseline performance levels. In addition, those who received Precision Teaching were below the 15th percentile rank at the initial assessment and above the 65th percentile at the post-intervention assessment in the math fluency subtest of the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement—Third Edition. Control participants did not demonstrate similar improvements. Results suggest that Precision Teaching could produce accelerated outcomes even when delivered via teleconferencing. Therefore, it could be a valuable system for helping students ameliorate potential learning losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Journal of Behavioral Education, 2025 · doi:10.1007/s10864-023-09520-w