School & Classroom

Technical Reading Comprehension in Preschool and Second-Grade Students

Morgan et al. (2025) · Behavior Analysis in Practice 2025
★ The Verdict

Put written steps in front of a desired item and kids quickly learn to read and do them.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running early elementary or preschool sessions in schools or clinics.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working only on conversational or leisure skills with older clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Seven preschool and second-grade kids took part. No child had a diagnosis listed.

The teacher set up short tasks. Each task showed two written steps. Kids had to read and then do the steps to reach a toy or snack.

This setup is called reader immersion. The team tracked read-do matches across sessions.

02

What they found

Every child learned to follow the written steps. Read-do matches rose to 100 percent for all seven kids.

Gains showed up quickly, usually within a handful of sessions.

03

How this fits with other research

Cariveau et al. (2017) also worked with second-grade literacy. They used a group prize system. Both studies got strong academic engagement, but Morgan used task design while Cariveau added extra rewards.

Herzog et al. (2026) tested a computer math program in early elementary. Their results were mixed; some kids learned fast, others did not. Morgan’s simpler read-do method produced steady success for every child.

May (2019) showed that choice plus praise boosts on-task behavior. Morgan kept tasks brief and functional, proving that clear work-reward links alone can build new academic skills without added praise or points.

04

Why it matters

You can build true reading comprehension without special software or tokens. Just place the instructions between the child and what they want. Start with two-step directions tied to stickers, games, or snacks. Watch for correct follow-through, then fade the setup as skills solidify. This low-prep approach fits centers, gen-ed rooms, or home sessions.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Take one preferred toy, write two short directions on an index card, and require the child to complete them before play starts.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
7
Population
not specified
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

Technical reading comprehension, a byproduct of read-do correspondence, refers to a student accurately reading and following written directions. Across two experiments, the present study evaluated the effects of a reader immersion procedure on the acquisition of read-do correspondence for preschool and second-grade students. The reader immersion procedure induces read-do correspondence as the participants must read a series of steps to access preferred stimuli. Within the first experiment, we tested the reader immersion procedure on the acquisition of read-do correspondence, as evidenced by read-draw and read-build responses, for four preschool students. The second experiment evaluated the effects of the reader immersion procedure on the acquisition of read-do correspondence, as evidenced by read-draw responses, for three second-grade students. All seven participants showed increases in read-do correspondence after the intervention. Implications for education and independent functioning are discussed. • Technical reading comprehension is a byproduct of read-do correspondence. • Educators can teach students to read and follow written instructions accurately by arranging the classroom environment and providing reinforcement. • Potential implication of this research, although not directly demonstrated, is that students may learn faster as they can independently complete tasks such as completing worksheets without the educator’s direct instruction. • Students may also learn to function independently outside the classroom by responding to environmental stimuli such as stop signs, recipes, and instructional manuals.

Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2025 · doi:10.1007/s40617-024-01018-9