Self-instructional training with preschoolers: an attempt to replicate.
Self-instruction scripts alone did not calm Head Start classrooms, so use simpler self-management tools for preschoolers.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team tried to repeat an earlier study. They taught Head Start preschoolers to talk themselves through tasks.
Kids learned short self-cue scripts like "I need to sit and listen." Teachers then watched for any drop in disruptive behavior.
Training lasted a few weeks. The goal was calmer classrooms without extra adult prompts.
What they found
Self-talk training did not cut disruptive behavior. Teacher ratings stayed flat.
Gains that showed up right after lessons faded fast. The method alone was not enough for these three- to five-year-olds.
How this fits with other research
Lerman et al. (1995) later got strong results with high-school students who had intellectual disability. They added many practice examples and let peers give the cues. Age, extra examples, and peer delivery may explain the flip from null to positive.
Pear et al. (1984) also saw success in young kids, but they used simple self-recording instead of long self-speech. Hyperactive elementary students marked their own on-task behavior each time the teacher signaled. Short, concrete actions worked; longer self-instruction did not.
Together the three papers hint that preschoolers may need simpler self-management tools than older students.
Why it matters
If you run classroom programs for preschoolers, do not bank on self-instruction scripts alone to curb disruption. Try brief self-recording or peer prompts first. Save longer self-talk packages for upper grades and add lots of examples and practice.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Try signaled self-recording instead: give a quiet beep every 5 min and have kids mark if they were on task.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We attempted to replicate an intervention program by Bornstein and Quevillon (1976), which had shown that the disruptive classroom behavior of Head Start children could be dramatically reduced through self-instructional training. Although the subject population and procedures were quite similar across studies, our self-instructional training did not produce socially significant, durable increases in either appropriate classroom behavior or changes in teacher ratings of the children's behavior. These results suggest that additional variables may have been responsible for Bornstein and Quevillon's success.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1985 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-61