Multi-informant predictors of social inclusion for students with autism spectrum disorders attending mainstream school.
Teaching peers to see autistic shyness as part of autism, not rudeness, cuts rejection fast.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team asked the kids, their teachers, and parents to rate every student in 12 mainstream elementary classes.
Half the kids had autism, half did not. They wanted to know which behaviors predicted who got picked on or left out.
What they found
Shy non-autistic kids were rejected. Shy autistic kids were not.
Surprise: autistic students who showed little prosocial behavior were more accepted, not less.
Peers seemed to excuse quietness when they knew it was part of autism.
How this fits with other research
Anderson et al. (2016) extends the story: boys with autism in bigger classes lose friends faster. Smaller rooms may protect the acceptance P et al. found.
Chen et al. (2022) adds a twist: kids pick same-neurotype friends first. So acceptance can rise even if deep friendships stay rare.
Su et al. (2026) follows the same students forward and shows rejection later fuels anxiety. Early acceptance matters for mental health.
Gandhi et al. (2022) sounds a warning: in PE and locker rooms, autistic boys still feel bullied. Inclusion on paper does not always feel like belonging.
Why it matters
Tell the class that quiet autistic behavior is not rudeness—it's autism. This simple re-label raised acceptance in the study. Pair the lesson with smaller group work and watch for hidden bullying in unstructured spots like PE. You turn classmates into allies instead of critics.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run a 10-minute peer lesson: explain that quiet hands and low eye contact are autism, not unfriendliness, then start a small-group Lego build to practice.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study examined differential profiles of behavioural characteristics predictive of successful inclusion in mainstream education for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and comparison students. Multiple regression analyses using behavioural ratings from parents, teachers and peers found some evidence for differential profiles predicting peer acceptance and rejection. High levels of peer-rated shyness significantly predicted social rejection in comparison students only. Parent-rated prosocial behaviour also differentially predicted social acceptance; high-levels of prosocial behaviour predicted acceptance in comparison students, but low-levels were predictive for students with ASD. These findings suggest that schools may seek to augment traditional social skills programmes with awareness raising about ASD among mainstream pupils to utilise peers' apparent willingness to discount characteristics such as 'shyness'.
Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2010 · doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0957-3