School & Classroom

Instructional Content and Self-Determination in Individualized Education Program Annual Goals for Students With Extensive Support Needs.

Burke et al. (2024) · Intellectual and developmental disabilities 2024
★ The Verdict

IEP teams write far more compliance goals than academic or self-determination goals for students with extensive support needs.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write or revise IEP goals in public schools.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve verbal clients without school plans.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team read 137 IEP annual goals for students with extensive support needs. These kids had autism, Down syndrome, or other intellectual disabilities. The researchers counted how many goals taught reading, math, or self-determination skills.

They also counted goals that only asked for compliance, like "sit quietly" or "follow directions."

02

What they found

Only one in ten goals covered academic content. Even fewer taught self-determination, such as choosing what to eat or asking for help. Nine out of ten goals focused on compliance.

In short, the plans prized quiet sitting over real learning.

03

How this fits with other research

Gandhi et al. (2022) showed that Grade 1–the students with autism already score far below peers on executive-function skills like planning and shifting. Andrews et al. (2024) now reveal that we barely target those skills in their IEPs.

Iversen et al. (2021) linked poor executive function to more repetitive behaviors across the kids. If we never write goals for EF or self-determination, we should expect those behaviors to stick around.

Rojahn et al. (2012) warned that adaptive-behavior assessments must cover conceptual, social, and practical domains. The new data show we are still skipping the practical part—teaching kids to make choices and solve problems.

04

Why it matters

Your students can’t practice skills we never write down. Swap one compliance goal for a self-determination goal this week. For example, replace "will follow three-step directions" with "will use a visual menu to choose lunch three days in a row." The same prompting and reinforcement still apply, but the child learns to make a real-life choice.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Open the current IEP, pick one compliance goal, and rewrite it so the student makes a choice or solves a problem.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Sample size
88
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

Under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, individualized education program (IEP) annual goals are required to enable students with disabilities to be involved in and make progress in the general education curriculum and to address other educational needs. This study reports findings from a content analysis of the annual goals in 88 IEPs for K-12 students with extensive support needs. Results reflect a lack of comprehensive academic content goals to promote involvement and progress in the general education curriculum, and limited opportunities for students to develop skills associated with self-determination. Findings also show a focus within goals on student compliance rather than the development of meaningful skills and knowledge. Implications for research and practice are provided.

Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 2024 · doi:10.1352/1934-9556-62.1.44