Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance.
Pay kids for accurate reading and they will read more and act out less.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Five boys in a regular third-grade class kept getting kicked out for talking out and leaving their seats.
The teacher gave each boy tokens when he read a page with no more than two errors. Tokens bought 15 minutes of free play. The researchers flipped the rule on and off four times to be sure it worked.
What they found
When reading earned tokens, the boys did twice as much work and disruption fell from a large share to almost zero. When tokens stopped, problems shot back up. When tokens came back, calm returned.
How this fits with other research
Petursdottir et al. (2019) ran the same idea 45 years later. They added a quick FBA and then slowly faded the tokens. Disruption still dropped a large share, showing the trick holds up and can be weaned.
Rapport et al. (1982) pushed the idea further. They paid inner-city teens with tokens for praising their tutees. Both tutors and tutees read better and stayed on task, proving the power spreads to older kids and peer pairs.
McKearney (1976) looks like a clash but isn’t. That study cut disruption by having the teacher talk faster, not by handing out tokens. Two tools, one goal: keep kids busy so trouble can’t start.
Why it matters
You don’t need a fancy plan for “behavior.” Just tie rewards to the work you want seen. Pick a clear academic response—reading a page, solving five math facts—and pay tokens for that. Disruption melts while skills grow. Start today with one learner and a pocket of stickers or points; the 1974 data say you’ll see change by lunch.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Count how many reading pages each student gets right; hand one token for every correct page and let them trade tokens for five minutes of a preferred game.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Behavior modification procedures have typically been used to eliminate discipline problems in the classroom through reinforcement of nondisruptive behavior. This report demonstrates an alternative approach whereby discipline problems are eliminated by reinforcing relevant academic skills. Five fifth-grade boys, identified by their teacher as discipline problems, were observed. The teacher conducted 15-min performance sessions in her reading class during which written academic performance and disruptive behavior were recorded. These measures indicated that the boys' average level of disruption was 34%, while their reading performance was below 50%. When systematic token reinforcement was applied to reading performance only, the rate of disruption fell drastically, and reading performance increased. When the reinforcement procedure was withdrawn, disruption again rose, and reading performance declined. The reinstatement of reinforcement doubled reading performance and eliminated disruption.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1974 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1974.7-71