Lessons from a Female Academician: Some Further Reflections on a Glass Ceiling
Female BCBAs in academia face real pay gaps and invisible barriers—use mentorship and WIBA to punch holes in the ceiling.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Rehfeldt (2018) wrote a personal story about her climb up the academic ladder. She shares the bumps she hit as a woman in behavior analysis.
The paper gives advice to new female professors. It is not a research study with numbers. It is a mentor talking to you over coffee.
What they found
The author found that hidden rules can stall women’s careers. She calls this the glass ceiling.
She lists fixes: find mentors, speak up, and share your story so others know they are not alone.
How this fits with other research
Li et al. (2019) extends this tale by adding hard data. Their survey shows women ABA faculty earn 6–15 % less than men at every rank. The numbers back up the ceiling Rehfeldt felt.
Sundberg et al. (2019) also extends the advice. They describe WIBA, a yearly conference built to give women the very mentorship Rehfeldt urges.
Together, the three papers form a ladder: Rehfeldt names the problem, Li proves it with pay data, and Sundberg offers a place to fix it.
Why it matters
If you advise female students or supervise new BCBAs, pass these papers along. Share the pay-gap numbers when you sit on hiring committees. Bring mentees to WIBA or create a local circle. One hour of your time can shorten someone else’s ten-year climb.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Email one early-career female colleague and invite her to coffee to share your own career map.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Much discussion has occurred in recent years regarding the participation of women in behavior analysis. The purpose of this article is to share lessons learned as a female academician and impart helpful information to other, newer female university faculty members.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2018 · doi:10.1007/s40617-018-0218-z