An Evaluation of Staff Reactivity Following Performance Feedback and Self-Monitoring Procedures in a Group Home Setting
Staff only keep high treatment integrity when they know someone is watching—build a cue that stays behind after you leave.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Fuesy et al. (2025) worked with group-home staff who support adults with disabilities.
The team gave workers brief performance feedback after each shift. Staff also filled out a short self-monitoring sheet.
Researchers then watched what happened to treatment integrity when the observer stayed in view and when the observer left.
What they found
Integrity scores jumped only on days the observer stood in the room. When the observer stepped out, scores fell back to baseline.
Self-monitoring plus feedback worked, but only while someone was visibly watching.
How this fits with other research
Ruby et al. (2022) had a different result. They gave group-home staff a tablet to self-monitor positive interactions. Scores tripled and stayed high with no observer in sight. The tablet itself seemed to cue the behavior.
Minard et al. (2026) also beat the observer problem. Preschool teachers used self-monitoring sheets and got feedback after unsupervised sessions. Positive interactions stayed above 60 per period even when the boss was gone.
The three studies look opposite, but the trick is the cue. Fuesy used paper sheets and live feedback; the others used tech or delayed feedback that kept the cue alive without a person in the room.
Why it matters
If you run group homes, school rooms, or clinics, plan for conspicuous cues. A tablet, a public scoreboard, or a promised late-day review can keep integrity high after you walk away. Without that cue, staff may slide the moment you leave.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Post the week’s integrity graph where staff clock out and tell them you will update it every Friday after an unseen observation.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Research has investigated staff management procedures that produce treatment adherence and maintenance over time. Treatment integrity is one of the most important aspects of staff management; without adequate treatment adherence, behavior analysts are unable to determine whether treatment is effective, function has been identified, or intervention revisions are needed. The literature on staff management procedures has demonstrated that performance feedback and self-monitoring are effective procedures for increasing treatment integrity of behavior plans in the presence of the observer, however, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of these procedures when the observer is absent. This study evaluated the effectiveness of performance feedback and self-monitoring procedures and the level of reactivity to the presence of an observer exhibited by staff trained to implement individualized behavior plans. The results showed that staff performance increased with the intervention almost exclusively in the conspicuous observation condition.
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2025 · doi:10.1080/01608061.2024.2348563