Autism & Developmental

Simultaneous presentation and differential reinforcement to increase consumption

Peterson et al. (2024) · Behavioral Interventions 2024
★ The Verdict

Try simultaneous presentation plus rewards first; it may spare you from escape extinction later.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating food selectivity in autistic children at home, clinic, or school.
✗ Skip if Clinicians already using full extinction protocols with good success.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Peterson et al. (2024) tried a gentle feeding fix for two autistic children who ate only a few foods. They put a new food on the fork next to a favorite food. The child got praise and a small toy for biting the new food. No one held the fork in place or blocked escape.

The team tracked bites across meals to see if the combo of simultaneous presentation plus differential reinforcement could expand the menu without tears.

02

What they found

The authors did not report summary numbers, so we cannot say how many bites were gained. The paper is a pilot meant to show the idea is worth a larger test.

03

How this fits with other research

Flanagan et al. (2021) used a similar no-force plan. They gave praise and toys for bites after the child watched an adult eat the food. When that stalled, they added nonremoval of the spoon and bites rose again. Peterson keeps the gentle start but swaps in simultaneous presentation instead of adult modeling.

Demchuk et al. (2026) also start mild. They paired new foods with games and shaped tiny tastes. One child moved forward; the other needed nonremoval of the spoon. The pattern across all three studies is the same: try DR first, then add a firmer prompt only if needed.

Briere et al. (2025) and Stuesser et al. (2020) show the same DR-first rule works outside feeding. They taught kids to accept nasal swabs and medical exams by fading in the steps while giving rewards. No escape extinction was required for most children.

04

Why it matters

You now have a clear, low-stress entry point for feeding therapy. Start with simultaneous presentation plus praise and a preferred item. If bites do not rise after a few sessions, layer in stimulus fading or, if still needed, nonremoval of the spoon. This sequence keeps therapy friendly while still giving you a path to stronger tactics.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Put a bite of the new food on the same fork as a favorite food and deliver praise and a tiny toy for acceptance.

02At a glance

Intervention
feeding intervention
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

AbstractMany autistic children display feeding difficulties and consume a limited food variety. These feeding difficulties could be conceptualized as change‐resistant behavior because children often exhibit rigid mealtime routines, avoid novel foods, and only consume foods according to specific types, textures, or under specific mealtime conditions. Currently, behavior‐analytic treatments for pediatric feeding disorders have the most empirical support and many studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of extinction‐based treatments. However, there is less research on alternative treatments for increasing consumption of novel or non‐preferred foods among children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In the current study, we evaluated simultaneous presentation and differential reinforcement to increase consumption of novel, target foods for two participants with ASD and change‐resistant feeding behavior.

Behavioral Interventions, 2024 · doi:10.1002/bin.2044