Autism & Developmental

Numerical skills in children with Down syndrome. Can they be improved?

Lanfranchi et al. (2015) · Research in developmental disabilities 2015
★ The Verdict

A twice-weekly, 30-minute training program built for the Down syndrome cognitive profile improved numerical skills and logical thinking compared to no-training controls.

✓ Read this if BCBAs serving elementary students with Down syndrome in school or clinic settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners looking only for language or daily-living interventions, or those working exclusively with other diagnoses.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The researchers built a numerical skills training program designed specifically for children with Down syndrome, taking the known strengths and weaknesses of their cognitive profile into account. The goal was to improve basic mathematical skills and logical thinking.

Thirty-six children with Down syndrome took part. Twenty-seven children received the training — twice a week, roughly 30 minutes per session, for two months. A control group of nine children received no training during that period. All children were assessed on numerical skills and logical thinking before and after the training phase.

02

What they found

After training, the intervention group performed better on numerical tests than the control group, which showed no equivalent gains. The results suggest the program is both feasible and effective for children with Down syndrome.

The structured, twice-weekly format appears to be enough dose to produce measurable differences in math and logical thinking within just two months.

03

How this fits with other research

[citation removed] ran a comparable design targeting visuospatial memory rather than numbers, using similarly brief computer sessions. Both studies demonstrate that short, targeted drills can produce meaningful skill gains in children with Down syndrome when the program is built around their specific cognitive profile.

[citation removed] tested number-based tasks with children who did not have Down syndrome and found different learning patterns, highlighting that training programs designed for a neurotypical population may not map cleanly onto Down syndrome learners.

[citation removed] noted the limited availability of rigorous developmental benchmarks for Down syndrome cognition. This study adds a short, replicable protocol to the evidence base while longer-term maintenance data continue to be gathered.

04

Why it matters

This study shows that a brief, twice-weekly 30-minute program built around the Down syndrome cognitive profile can move numerical skills within two months. If you work with elementary-age learners with Down syndrome, structured number sessions at this dose are worth adding to your schedule. Run a short baseline on counting and basic comparison tasks, start sessions twice a week, and track correct responses to monitor progress.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a short baseline on counting 1–10 and basic number comparison, then start 30-minute numerical skills sessions twice this week.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
36
Population
down syndrome
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

The present study aims to explore the impact of a numerical skills training program on the basic mathematical skills and logical thinking in children with Down syndrome (DS). The training program was built specifically for children with DS, bearing the strengths and weaknesses of their particular cognitive profile in mind. Two groups of children with DS took part in the study. All children were tested before and after the training on measures of numerical skills and logical thinking. One group of 27 children was trained in numerical skills twice a week for 2 months, for about 30min per session. A control group of 9 children was not involved in any training session. After training, children in the intervention group performed better in numerical tests, while those in the control group did not. These results suggest that our training program is both feasible and effective for children with Down syndrome.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2015 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.006