Assessment & Research

Theory of mind in children with severe speech and physical impairments.

Dahlgren et al. (2010) · Research in developmental disabilities 2010
★ The Verdict

Language-heavy false-belief tasks underestimate theory-of-mind skill in children with severe speech impairments—use low-language formats to get an accurate picture.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess or teach social skills to non-speaking children, AAC users, or any client with motor speech limits.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with fully verbal, neurotypical learners.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team compared theory-of-mind scores for kids who have severe speech and physical impairments against kids matched for mental age.

They gave two kinds of false-belief tasks: one that needed lots of talking and one that used pictures and pointing.

The goal was to see if language demands hide social-thinking skill.

02

What they found

Kids with speech impairments scored far below their mental-age peers on the language-heavy task.

On the low-language task the gap almost vanished.

The result says the problem is the test format, not the child’s social mind.

03

How this fits with other research

Matson et al. (2004) warned the field first: poor narrative language can fake a false-belief failure in kids with ID.

Thirion-Marissiaux et al. (2008) looked similar but saw parallel emotion-ToM growth; the clash fades once you see they tested mild ID, not speech loss.

Amorim et al. (2025) stretched the point across autism, ADHD, and OCD, showing IQ and social-communication trump diagnosis—backing the call for less verbal tasks.

04

Why it matters

Before you write “poor perspective-taking” in an AAC user’s report, swap the verbal task for a picture or puppet version. You may find the skill is there, just hidden by language demands.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Try a pointing-based false-belief story instead of a verbal one and compare scores.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
quasi experimental
Population
other
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

The development of a person's ability to understand other's thoughts and feelings, so-called "theory of mind" (ToM), is subject to study. Children with communicative disabilities have exhibited problems in this respect, highlighting the role of language in the development of ToM. In this study, ToM was studied in children with cerebral palsy and severe speech impairments. Two tasks, differently dependent on verbal abilities, were used. The results were compared to those of a mental age matched group. The groups differed significantly on the verbally dependent task while difference in performance did not reach significance on the less verbally dependent one. The results are discussed in terms of a delayed development of ToM in children with severe speech and physical impairments, dependent on verbal abilities.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2010 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2009.12.010