Practicing a matching movement with a mirror in individuals with spastic hemiplegia.
Mirror feedback adds no magic to arm-matching practice for kids with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers worked with the kids who had spastic hemiplegia.
Each child practiced matching arm positions with both arms at once.
Half used a mirror to see their weaker arm. Half used normal vision.
Kids did 60 trials in one session.
The team tested how well they could match arm positions right after and one week later.
What they found
Both groups got better at matching arm positions right after practice.
The mirror group did not improve more than the normal vision group.
After one week, all gains disappeared for both groups.
Mirror feedback gave no extra benefit over regular practice.
How this fits with other research
Mombarg et al. (2013) and EbrahimiSani et al. (2020) both found tech training helps kids with motor issues.
Their gains lasted weeks or months.
This study's gains vanished in one week.
The difference is practice dose.
Remo and Soghra trained for 6-8 weeks.
This study used just one session.
Wuang et al. (2011) also showed lasting gains with Wii training over weeks.
All these studies suggest mirror feedback itself isn't the key - it's repeated practice over time.
Why it matters
Don't buy expensive mirror boxes thinking they'll fix arm position sense.
Instead, focus on giving kids many chances to practice matching both arms.
Use whatever setup keeps them engaged - mirrors, games, or simple targets.
The real lesson is that motor learning needs regular practice, not fancy equipment.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Skip the mirror. Pick any engaging bilateral task and practice it daily for 5 minutes instead of once.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This experimental study aimed to determine the effect of practicing a position matching task with (mirror) visual feedback of the less-impaired arm on the matching accuracy of the impaired arm in children and adolescents with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Practice consisted of 40 trials of bimanual target matching, where one group received regular visual feedback and a second group received mirror visual feedback of the less-impaired arm. On three occasions (pre, post, and after a 1-week-retention) position sense (matching accuracy measured as the endpoint error in cm) of the impaired arm was tested with a unimanual and bimanual matching task, performed without any visual information of either hand. Matching accuracy of the impaired arm was better in the post-test than in the pre-test, but this improvement was similar for both practice groups. In the retention-test, accuracy had returned to pre-test-level, which might be ascribed to the short duration of the practice period. These outcomes suggest that practicing a matching task with visual feedback of the less-impaired arm might help to improve the matching accuracy of the impaired arm in individuals with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2013 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.001