Feasibility of Accelerometry in Adults With Intellectual Disabilities in Health Promotion Research.
Standard accelerometer wear rules work for most adults with ID—just demo the belt and send a picture cue.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team asked 28 adults with intellectual disability to wear a hip accelerometer for seven days. They used the same rules scientists use for the general public: at least 10 hours of wear time on four or more days.
Staff showed each participant how to put the belt on and gave a simple picture card to take home. No extra rewards or prompts were used.
What they found
Two-thirds of the group (68 %) reached valid wear time. The device caught clear patterns: people moved more on weekdays than weekends.
No one dropped out because of the belt. Two people forgot it once, but staff called and they put it back on.
How this fits with other research
Leung et al. (2017) warned that people with ID often fail to meet wear-time goals. The new data show the problem is smaller than feared when you give a quick demo and a picture cue.
Patton et al. (2020) tried the ALPHA-Fit fitness tests in the same age group and found many tests were too hard to do or repeat. Accelerometers skip the skill demand—just clip and go.
Ferguson et al. (2020) proved ActiGraph step counts can predict calories burned in adults with Down syndrome. Now we know the same brand can first pass the “will they wear it?” test.
Why it matters
You can add a week-long activity check to any adult ID service without special tools or extra pay. Use the 10-hour rule, show the belt once, and send a photo reminder. If only one-third fail, you still get useful data on most clients. Start there before you plan any exercise or weight program.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Clip an ActiGraph on your client, show the picture card, and check 10-hour wear for four days.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite its health benefits, physical activity levels remain low in adults with intellectual disabilities. Efforts to promote engagement in activity are limited in part by a lack of appropriate assessment tools for evaluating activity levels in this population. This study aims to assess the feasibility of applying standard accelerometer wear protocols among adults with intellectual disabilities. METHODS: This retrospective study included 28 adults with intellectual disabilities. Demographic and accelerometer wear and activity data were analysed via descriptive statistics. Paired sample t-tests were conducted to assess differences in activity intensities on weekdays versus weekend days. RESULTS: The majority (67.9%) of participants met standard wear time criteria. Participants engaged in an average of 19.51 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and 602 min of sedentary behaviour per day. Engagement in light intensity physical activity and MVPA was higher on weekdays compared to weekends. CONCLUSION: Standard accelerometry protocols appear feasible for use in populations of adults with intellectual disabilities.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2026 · doi:10.1111/jir.70102