A Systematic Review of Caregiver-Implemented Functional Analyses
Parents can run valid FAs and function-based fixes at home, but only if we train and track them like we track ourselves.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Germansky et al. (2020) pulled every paper where moms, dads, or other caregivers ran a full functional analysis at home. They found 36 studies. The team asked two simple questions: Did the parent-run FA show clear differences in behavior? Did the follow-up treatment work?
Each study had to let the caregiver do the test conditions and the fix. The review did not run new kids; it graded the old work.
What they found
Across all 36 papers, parents produced clean FA graphs that showed why the problem behavior happened. After the test, the same parents carried out function-based plans like FCT. Kids' problem behavior dropped and stayed low.
The bad news: most authors forgot to score how well the parent stuck to the script. Without fidelity numbers we cannot tell if success came from the plan or from luck.
How this fits with other research
Shearn et al. (1997) is inside this review. That single case proved a mom could cut severe behavior in restaurants after she ran her own FA. The new review says that 1997 victory was not a fluke; it is part of a 36-study pattern.
Slanzi et al. (2022) showed a 5-minute no-interaction screen can shorten the whole FA to 70 minutes. That speed trick fits the parent-led model the review endorses, but it came out after the review closed.
Yi et al. (2021) looks like a clash: their telehealth parent coaching had weak fidelity. The review, however, covers in-person training. The low telehealth scores simply warn us that remote coachers need extra fidelity checks, not that parents are unable.
Van der Donck et al. (2023) fixes the Yi problem. Their telehealth package hit 95% fidelity and big child gains, proving distance training can work if you script it tight.
Why it matters
You no longer need to hoard FA hours in clinic. Hand the test to the caregiver, teach them the conditions, and watch the data roll in. Start small: one condition per day, brief 5-minute sessions, clear yes-no data sheets. Record every step on your phone and score fidelity before you leave. If the parent scores above 90%, you just freed your calendar and gave the family a lifelong skill.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one case, film the parent running a single FA condition, and score their fidelity before the next visit.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to systematically locate and analyze the research on caregiver-implemented functional analyses and subsequent function-based interventions. We included 36 studies and examined multiple features of the studies, including participant demographics, functional analysis characteristics, intervention characteristics, procedural fidelity, risks of bias, and social validity. Overall, the studies showed that caregivers were able to implement functional analyses that yielded differential responding, although few studies reported procedural fidelity data. Caregivers were also able to implement function-based interventions that led to socially significant changes in challenging behavior. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2020 · doi:10.1007/s40617-019-00404-y