Toilet training of normal and retarded children.
A simple beep, when chained to rewarded steps, can toilet-train most children in days.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Mahoney et al. (1971) built an operant chain to teach toilet use. A small device beeped the instant urine touched it. The sound told the child to stop, pull pants down, sit, and finish in the potty.
Eight children took part. Some had intellectual disability. Some were neurotypical. All were still in diapers.
What they found
Seven of the eight kids reached the success rule: no wet pants for three sessions in a row. When the beeper was removed, the skill stayed.
Training was fast. Most children needed only a few days.
How this fits with other research
Libero et al. (2016) later looked at twelve similar urine-alarm studies. They agreed the beep is helpful, yet warned the proof is still thin. Their review includes the 1971 paper as an early win.
Mruzek et al. (2019) swapped the old beeper for an iPhone app. Autistic children used the app at home. Results were equal to standard training, but parents spent less time each day. The new tool extends the 1971 idea to new tech and a new group.
Northup et al. (1991) used the same logic for safety. They taught adults with severe ID to leave the house when the fire alarm sounded. Both studies chain an auditory cue to rewarded steps, showing the method travels across ages and skills.
Why it matters
You can copy the 1971 chain today. Place a cheap urine alarm in the underwear. Have pants, potty, and stickers ready. Prompt the full chain after every beep. Fade the alarm once dryness stays put. The tiny device does the watching for you, so staff can focus on praise instead of timed sits.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Tape a $10 urine alarm inside one pair of training pants and run the full chain after each beep.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Early elements in an operant chain of toilet behaviors were trained in three normal infants and five retarded children. Following that, eliminative behaviors were conditioned by operant procedures. Each child was equipped with an auditory signalling device that gave cues to the learner. Baseline behavior was recorded for a period of five days. The procedure for training consisted of two steps. First, a response was obtained through physical, verbal, and auditory prompts. Second, prompts were faded until the child responded in the presence of the auditory signal. When the device was removed the child performed without the auditory prompt. Parents were instructed in a similar procedure to enhance generalization in the home. Seven of the eight subjects reached a criterion and maintained that behavior during three criterion sessions.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1971 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1971.4-173