Faustian bargains: Short‐term and long‐term contingencies in phylogeny, ontogeny, and sociogeny
Short-term versus long-term payoff battles shape evolution, learning, and culture—use this lens when your client’s quick reinforcers sabotage long-term goals.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Stahlman et al. (2023) wrote a theory paper. They asked one question: what happens when short-term payoffs fight long-term payoffs?
The team looked at three levels. Evolution picks traits that help genes survive. Learning picks behaviors that help one person survive. Culture picks practices that help groups survive. At every level, quick rewards can beat slow ones.
What they found
The authors found a pattern. Short-term wins often hurt long-term health. A monkey grabs fruit now even if it gets less fruit later. A student scrolls TikTok now even if it hurts exam scores later. A town burns coal now even if it warms the planet later.
They call these Faustian bargains. The deal feels good today but costs more tomorrow.
How this fits with other research
Baum (2017) used math to show the same fight inside one lifetime. Stahlman widens the lens to evolution and culture. The ideas fit like nesting dolls.
McDowell (2004) built digital organisms that followed Darwinian rules. The fake creatures picked the smaller-sooner reward, just like real ones. Stahlman uses the same logic to explain why societies repeat short-sighted choices.
Roane et al. (2001) reviewed dozens of human discounting studies. People devalue rewards that arrive later. Stahlman says this bias scales up: species, persons, and whole cultures all show the same tilt.
Why it matters
Next time a client chooses a quick reinforcer that wrecks long-term goals, think Faustian bargain. You can’t erase the bias, but you can change the game. Make the delayed payoff visible. Add extra rewards for waiting. Bring future costs into today. The paper reminds us that the fight between now and later is baked into biology, learning, and culture. Your intervention has to win at all three levels.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Put a visual timer next to the long-term task and deliver praise every 30 s of on-task behavior to bridge the delay.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Rachlin's interpretations of self‐control depend on the short‐term versus the long‐term consequences of behavior. Sometimes these effects support each other (typing an abstract produces a written product now and is later read by others). Sometimes they conflict (procrastination now is incompatible with finishing the abstract by deadline). We usually reserve the language of self‐control for human cases where long‐term consequences are chosen over short‐term ones. Rachlin made this distinction salient in ontogeny, but it also applies to selection in phylogeny (Darwinian evolution) and sociogeny (behavior passed from one organism to another). Our account examines relations between short‐term and long‐term consequences at each level of selection. For example, sexual selection has adaptive, short‐term mating consequences but may drive species to extreme specializations that jeopardize long‐term survival. In sociogeny, as in the Tragedy of the Commons, group members may get immediate economic benefits from exploiting resources but exhaust those resources over the long term. Whatever the level, when short‐term and long‐term consequences have opposing effects, adaptive behavior may depend on whether temporally extended contingencies exert more control than more immediate benefits.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2023 · doi:10.1002/jeab.812