Evaluating Behavioral Skills Training to Improve Bowling Form of Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
BST quickly gives adults with IDD picture-perfect bowling form, but you need extra incentives to turn better form into higher scores.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Green-Short et al. (2025) taught three adults with intellectual disabilities how to bowl better. The team used Behavioral Skills Training: explain, model, practice, and feedback. They tracked form steps like stance, swing, and release across 18 games.
What they found
Every adult’s form score jumped from about 30 % to 90 %. Strikes and spares did not rise; the final pin count stayed flat. Clean form did not equal more points.
How this fits with other research
Mammarella et al. (2022) also gave adults with IDD a brief BST package. Their clients learned to sit through a real dental exam without sedation. Together, the two studies show BST can open doors to both leisure and health-care settings.
Quiroz et al. (2023) used one BST session to teach kids to avoid allergenic foods. Both papers got big skill gains, but the kids also kept themselves safe, while the bowlers did not score higher. The difference is the payoff: safety kept, pins did not.
Briggs et al. (2024) scoped 51 studies and found most teams trim BST steps to save time. Green-Short used the full four-step package; future replications could test a leaner version and see if form gains hold.
Why it matters
If you want adults with IDD to look like bowlers and feel included in league night, BST works fast. Add reinforcement or competitive games if you also want the scoreboard to change.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Film a short model of the four key bowling moves, have your client practice twice, give tagged feedback, and log form points for three games.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
ABSTRACT This study evaluated the effectiveness of behavioral skills training (BST) as an intervention to improve bowling form of three adults with mild to moderate intellectual disability. We used a nonconcurrent multiple baseline design to evaluate the changes in each participant's bowling form. Across all three participants, form improved with BST alone and one participant's form improved even more with the addition of a tangible reinforcement component. However, the number of pins knocked down did not substantially change across participants between baseline, intervention, and follow‐up. The results of this study suggest that BST is an effective intervention for improving specific components of sports‐related skills, such as bowling form, in individuals with intellectual disability, though further research is needed to evaluate its impact on performance outcomes.
Behavioral Interventions, 2025 · doi:10.1002/bin.70030